Strelski v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff “was not required to identify every other or even one other individual who had been arrested pursuant to a warrant obtained through the complained-of process”
• holding that plaintiff “was not required to identify every other or even one other individual” who had suffered the same harm because plaintiff had alleged facts indicative of department-wide practice
• explaining that it is well-settled that there is no heightened pleading standard for Monell claims
• noting that plaintiff “was not required to identify every other or even one other individual who had been arrested pursuant to a warrant obtained through the complained-of process”
• noting that plaintiff “was not required to identify every other or even one other individual who had been arrested pursuant to a warrant obtained through the complained-of process.”
• noting that plaintiff “was not required to identify every other or even one other individual who had been arrested pursuant to a warrant obtained through the complained-of process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).