Street v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well established that ‘a competent witness, who has investigated and is familiar with the contents of the entire mass [of records] may testify that certain entries in the corporate records do not exist.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Street v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-25· cited 11×
• Schmitt v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-08-31· cited 10×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Midgett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-01· cited 150×
• Logan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-11· cited 117×
• Tate and Hall v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-09-15· cited 24×
• Smith v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-10-16· cited 21×
• State v. Falkenham
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1891-02-20· cited 18×
• Hutchinson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-05-13· cited 8×