Skip to main content
· 1/4/1999

Street, Sound Around Electronics, Inc. v. M/V Royal Container

Citations

  • 30 F. Supp. 2d 661
  • 1999 A.M.C. 1805
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3
  • 1999 WL 2874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding German forum selection clause where plaintiff was a signatory to the bill of lading and thus the “possibility of parallel proceedings” in multiple fora “was a contingency entirely foreseeable”
  • “The possibility of multiple parallel proceedings was a contingency entirely foreseeable to plaintiff when it agreed to the forum selection clause.”
  • finding the clause mandatory after lengthy analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rakoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.