Streamcast Networks, Inc. v. Skype Technologies, S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the few cases in which courts have acknowledged the possibility of limiting the relevant market to a single brand have involved markets for replacement parts for specific brands of durable goods where consumers are ‘locked-in’ to maintaining them”
• rejecting the plaintiff's narrow market definition where alternatives “permit[ted] 11 users to accomplish the same basic task”
• rejecting the plaintiff’s narrow market definition where alternatives “permit[ted] users 18 to accomplish the same basic task”
• “[T]he few cases in which courts have 6 acknowledged the possibility of limiting the relevant market to a single brand have involved 7 markets for replacement parts for specific brands of durable goods where consumers are ‘locked- 8 in’ to maintaining them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).