Straws v. Von Gunden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Facebook did not become the ‘information content provider’ 22 under § 230(c)(1) merely by virtue of reviewing the contents of the suspect account and deciding 23 not remove it.”
• “We agree with the district court that four separate fires in four separate buildings at four separate locations constitute four separate occurrences for purposes of plaintiffs’ liability and the policy deductible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).