Skip to main content
· 10/14/2010

Strauss v. Newmarket Global Consulting Group, LLC

Citations

  • 5 A.3d 1027
  • 2010 D.C. App. LEXIS 589
  • 2010 WL 4003928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because an unjust enrichment claim is analogous to the legal remedies of breach of contract and conversion, § 5–101 provides the statute of limitations
  • The determination of whether an enforceable contract exists is a question of law, which we review de novo .
  • \The party asserting the existence of the oral contract has the burden of proving that an enforceable agreement exists.\
  • “We have declined to uphold oral contracts in cases where critical details of the proposed transaction could not be proved.”
  • as applied to oral contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Washington, Blackburne-Rigsby, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.