Strauss v. American Home Products Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to remand where evidence showed diverse successor in interest was the proper defendant and not the non-diverse predecessor in interest
• “Simply put, individuals who qualify as Program claimants must file petitions in the Vaccine Court in order to pursue any vaccine-related claims at all”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).