South Dakota Supreme Court· 1/29/1986
Straub v. Straub
Citations
- 381 N.W.2d 260
- 1986 S.D. LEXIS 206
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[t]here is a vast difference [ ] between a disinclination or unwillingness to pay alimony and an inability to pay”
- stating that in awarding alimony, there are several factors that the circuit court “must rest its decision upon[,]” one of which includes the parties’ “financial condition after the property division[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Wuest, Fosheim, Morgan, Hertz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-01-14· cited 73×
- Cole v. ColeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-03-12· cited 71×
- Baltzer v. BaltzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-13· cited 52×
- Hisgen v. HisgenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-10-09· cited 43×
- Ryken v. RykenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-04-26· cited 36×
- Caughron v. CaughronSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 35×
- DeVries v. DeVriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-07-06· cited 34×
- Bradeen v. BradeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 34×
- Wegner v. WegnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-07-30· cited 31×
- Henrichs v. HenrichsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 31×
- Stemper v. StemperSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 29×
- Lampert v. LampertSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-06-11· cited 26×
- Tate v. TateSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-10-08· cited 24×
- Olson v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-07-17· cited 21×
- Wilson v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-01-21· cited 17×
- Osman v. Keating-OsmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-09-07· cited 16×
- Bell v. BellSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-04-21· cited 14×
- McGee v. McGeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-11-18· cited 11×
- Hoy v. HoySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-07-30· cited 9×
- Lodde v. LoddeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 9×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-04-03· cited 197×
- Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-05-20· cited 129×
- Guindon v. GuindonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-08-17· cited 107×
- Hanks v. HanksSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-09-03· cited 101×
- Wallahan v. WallahanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-09-26· cited 95×
- Krage v. KrageSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-02-09· cited 73×
- Rykhus v. RykhusSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-05-12· cited 60×
- Owen v. OwenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 46×
- Nauman v. NaumanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-06-09· cited 28×
- Grant v. GrantSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-02-17· cited 24×
- Kuehn v. KuehnSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1952-10-16· cited 19×
- Morrison v. MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-09-01· cited 17×
- Fossum v. FossumSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-09-04· cited 9×
Other cases named Straub v. Straub
10 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Straub v. StraubCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-03-13· cited 19×
- Straub v. StraubMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-02-22· cited 6×
- Straub v. StraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1924-04-04· cited 5×
- Straub v. StraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-11-15· cited 3×
- Straub v. StraubIdaho Supreme Court· 1958-07-02· cited 2×
- Straub v. StraubCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2005-07-28
- Straub v. StraubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1965-08-02
- Straub v. StraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1923-10-15
- Straub v. StraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1923-10-15
- Straub v. StraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1923-11-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.