Straub v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that a claim that excess property has been taken is addressed under the necessity prong
• “a public entity need not plan to use condemned property for public purpose forever to justify the initial public use”
• \a public entity need not plan to use condemned property for public purpose forever to justify the initial public use\
• no due process violation where landowner received actual notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).