· 1/13/1984
Strathmere v. Karavas
Citations
- 100 F.R.D. 478
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the collateral order test satisfied because the question of immunity from suit was totally unconnected with the merits of the action
- finding the collateral order test satisfied because the question of immunity from suit was totally unconnected with the merits of the action
- also cited as Forsyth I because the court of appeals decided both cases in a single opinion
- statute designed to deter or prevent government from improperly invading individual privacy
- “the decision of the Attorney General, or a prosecuting attorney, to initiate a prosecution is not made in a vacuum ... [t]he right to make the decision ... must include some limited right to gather necessary information”
- If Attorney General's authorization of warrantless wiretap was made in attempt to secure information to determine whether to initiate a criminal prosecution, then he was entitled to absolute immunity. Case remanded to district court for development of the record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.