Skip to main content
· 1/13/1984

Strathmere v. Karavas

Citations

  • 100 F.R.D. 478
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the collateral order test satisfied because the question of immunity from suit was totally unconnected with the merits of the action
  • finding the collateral order test satisfied because the question of immunity from suit was totally unconnected with the merits of the action
  • also cited as Forsyth I because the court of appeals decided both cases in a single opinion
  • statute designed to deter or prevent government from improperly invading individual privacy
  • “the decision of the Attorney General, or a prosecuting attorney, to initiate a prosecution is not made in a vacuum ... [t]he right to make the decision ... must include some limited right to gather necessary information”
  • If Attorney General's authorization of warrantless wiretap was made in attempt to secure information to determine whether to initiate a criminal prosecution, then he was entitled to absolute immunity. Case remanded to district court for development of the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.