Strategic Value Master Fund, Ltd. v. Cargill Financial Services, Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the availability of letters rogatory is relevant to a court’s analysis when deciding whether to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds
• concluding that the choice of law factor did not weigh in favor of either party where plaintiff argued that there was no actual conflict between English and New York state law on contract formation, but the Court might be required to apply English law to resolve other issues in the case
• \When evaluating a motion for dismissal pursuant to forum non conveniens ... the availability of letters rogatory is relevant to a court's analysis.\
• “When evaluating a motion for dismissal pursuant to forum non conveniens . . . the availability of letters rogatory is relevant to a court's analysis.”
• “Where most of the witnesses and documentary evidence reside in a foreign country, conducting trial in the U.S. could impose such significant burdens on the parties that dismissal is favored.”
• “Where most of the witnesses and documentary evidence reside in a foreign country, conducting trial in the U.S. could impose such significant burdens on the parties that dismissal is favored.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).