Strategic Development & Construction, Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is appropriate under Rule 12(b)(6) to consider a \document that is central to the complaint\ but was not appended to the complaint
• stating that if a court does not exclude matters outside the pleadings, a Rule 12(b)(6
• explaining that “a Rule 12(b)(6) motion that presents a document that is a matter of public record need not be treated as a motion for summary judgment.”
• stating that the non-moving party must respond to a “Rule 12(b)(6) motion within ten days” or otherwise, “the superior court has discretion to grant the motion summarily.”
• concluding that “[b]ecause the extraneous documents were both matters of public record and the basis of one of the claims in the complaint, . . . the court did not abuse its discretion by granting the motion without permitting the plaintiff an opportunity to respond pursuant to Rule 56”
• noting “a Rule 12(b)(6) motion that presents a document that is a matter of public record need not be treated as a motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).