Skip to main content
· 3/23/1973

Stratchborneo v. Arc Music Corp.

Citations

  • 357 F. Supp. 1393
  • 179 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 403
  • 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that copying that is small or common must be “especially unique or qualitatively important”
  • the similarities must be “so striking and of such nature as to preclude the possibility of coincidence, accident or independent creation.”
  • phrase “MOJO” is “so commonplace as to be substantially within the public domain”
  • “[S]ubstantial similarity cannot be established . . . simply by showing that both . . . songs focus on [a particular] idea; [the plaintiff] to prevail must establish that the [defendants], in a material way, tracked his . . . treatment of that idea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brieant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.