Stranz v. Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc. (In Re Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a sexual harassment claim brought against a debtor’s successor entity was a personal injury tort under section 157(b)(5
• concluding that a sexual harassment claim brought against a successor entity of the debtor was a personal injury tort claim within the purview of section 157(b)(5
• suggesting financial, business, and property tort claims are not a personal injury tort
• also holding that the 17 provisions regarding personal injury tort and wrongful death claims are not constitutionally mandated
• also holding that the 2 provisions regarding personal injury tort and wrongful death claims are not constitutionally mandated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).