STRANGE v. TOWNS Et Al.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that trial court erred in considering parol evidence where seemingly contradictory language could be reconciled through interpreting the Settlor’s intention via language used and rules of law
• finding that trial court erred in considering parol evidence where seemingly contradictory language could be reconciled through interpreting the settlor’s intention via language used and rules of law
• “In construing a trust instrument it is the duty of a court to find the intention of the settlor and to effectuate that intention insofar as the language used and the rules of law will permit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).