Skip to main content
· 7/7/2008

Strandlund v. Hawley

Citations

  • 532 F.3d 741
  • 71 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 38
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14274
  • 2008 WL 2631572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing a district court’s choice under Rule 21 regarding whether to sever claims or drop parties
  • “[T]he ‘discretion delegated to the trial judge to dismiss under Rule 21 is restricted to what is “just.”’”
  • an action dismissed without prejudice under Rule 21 “is treated for statute of limitations purposes as if it had never been filed” (quoting Elmore, 227 F.3d at 1011)
  • interpreting “gratuitous harm” in the context of remedying misjoinder
  • interpreting “gratuitous harm” in the context of remedying misjoinder
  • reviewing dismissal for misjoinder under abuse of discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Bye, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.