· 7/7/2008
Strandlund v. Hawley
Citations
- 532 F.3d 741
- 71 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 38
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14274
- 2008 WL 2631572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing a district court’s choice under Rule 21 regarding whether to sever claims or drop parties
- “[T]he ‘discretion delegated to the trial judge to dismiss under Rule 21 is restricted to what is “just.”’”
- an action dismissed without prejudice under Rule 21 “is treated for statute of limitations purposes as if it had never been filed” (quoting Elmore, 227 F.3d at 1011)
- interpreting “gratuitous harm” in the context of remedying misjoinder
- interpreting “gratuitous harm” in the context of remedying misjoinder
- reviewing dismissal for misjoinder under abuse of discretion standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Bye, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.