Washington Supreme Court· 4/15/1913

Strandall v. Alaska Lumber Co.

Citations

73 Wash. 67
131 P. 211
1913 Wash. LEXIS 1556

Syllabus

<p>Corporations-Actions-Venue — “Transacting Business.” Where a corporation sent an agent to another county who there purchased lumber, and caused the same to be shipped direct to other points, it is “transacting business” in such county, within the meaning of Rem. & Bal. Code, § 206, authorizing suits to be commenced against a corporation in any county where it transacts business.</p>

Judges: Mount

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State ex rel. Grays Harbor Commercial Co. v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court· 1922-02-25· cited 11×
State ex rel. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court· 1921-06-14· cited 9×
Cohagen v. Big Bend Land Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1920-01-12· cited 2×
Wallace v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
W.D. Washington· 1925-04-21· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Hayworth v. McDonald
Washington Supreme Court· 1912-03-18· cited 18×
Lee v. Fidelity Storage & Transfer Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1908-12-11· cited 10×
Collins v. Hazel Lumber Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1909-08-26· cited 8×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.