Strand v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[e]xpert testimony as to the amount of lost profits is admissible and may be sufficient to support a jury verdict\ and acknowledging the substantial lay witness testimony admitted at trial
• “[T]his is a suit in equity to foreclose a 7 mechanic’s lien.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).