Strand v. Herrick & Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• letter “construed to give reasonable effect to each of its terms, so as not to render any provision superfluous”
• letter “construed to give reasonable effect to each of its terms, so as not to render any provision superfluous”
• “implicit in our reversal on the merits is a finding that Strand’s action was not ‘insubstantial, frivolous and not advanced in good faith’ within the meaning of c. 231, § 6F”
• signatory to a settlement agreement, which incorporated by reference a letter written by her attorney, was presumed to have agreed to the obligations set forth in the letter as well as in the agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).