Skip to main content
· 7/21/1994

Stramka v. Salt River Recreation, Inc.

Citations

  • 877 P.2d 1339
  • 179 Ariz. 283
  • 169 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 38
  • 1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the purpose of the recreational use statute is not fulfilled by granting immunity to a concessionaire who does not open land for public use but merely uses it to generate business profits for itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noyes, Jacobson, Fidel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.