Skip to main content
· 3/23/1994

Strahan v. Davis

Citations

  • 872 S.W.2d 828
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 656
  • 1994 WL 90091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting appellee’s argument that award was supported by his testimony that his knee was “popping” and his eye was itching while he testified at trial
  • requiring meaningful evidentiary review of determinations of reasonable compensation
  • requiring meaningful evidentiary review of determinations of reasonable compensation
  • requiring meaningful evidentiary review of determinations of reasonable compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Cummings, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.