· 3/23/1994
Strahan v. Davis
Citations
- 872 S.W.2d 828
- 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 656
- 1994 WL 90091
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting appellee’s argument that award was supported by his testimony that his knee was “popping” and his eye was itching while he testified at trial
- requiring meaningful evidentiary review of determinations of reasonable compensation
- requiring meaningful evidentiary review of determinations of reasonable compensation
- requiring meaningful evidentiary review of determinations of reasonable compensation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Cummings, Vance
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.