Stowman v. Carlson Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the law does not provide relief to an employee who expected job security based on the reputation of the company or on the personal reputation of the company’s owner’
• relying on Portlance, applying section 541.07(5)’s two-year statute of limitations to wrongful-discharge case
• applying Portlance v. Golden Valley State Bank, 405 N.W.2d 240, 243 (Minn. 1987)
• applying Portlance v. Golden Valley State Bank, 405 N.W.2d 240, 243 (Minn. 1987)
• potential employer has no duty to disclose to a job applicant negotiations to sell the company
• potential employer has no duty to disclose to a job applicant negotiations to sell the company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).