Skip to main content
· 10/26/2006

Stowers v. Clinton Central School Corp.

Citations

  • 855 N.E.2d 739
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 2151
  • 2006 WL 3026304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Stowers’ proposed instruction set out that the Release Forms did not absolve Clinton Central of liability for negligent acts if they did not contain language specifically referring to negligence; thus, it was a correct statement of the law.”
  • “The 8 Stowers’ proposed instruction set out that the Release Forms did not absolve Clinton Central of liability for negligent acts if they did not contain language specifically referring to negligence; thus, it was a correct statement of the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Robb, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.