Skip to main content
· 7/7/2011

Stowell v. Huddleston

Citations

  • 643 F.3d 631
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13779
  • 2011 WL 2637690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a court should not define the relevant circumstances so broadly “that it enables an otherwise unqualified witness to offer expert opinion”
  • affirming district court’s finding that ophthalmologist “was not qualified to offer expert opinion on the applicable standard of care” for orthopedic spine surgeries
  • applying Minnesota law to determine competency of a physician expert witness outside his area of expertise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Arnold, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.