· 7/1/1850
Stowell v. Goodenow & Rounds
Citations
- 31 Me. 538
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is ‘differing,’ ‘separate,’ ‘distinct’ transactions or occurrences that permit a separately appealable judgment, not differing legal theories or issues presented for recovery on the same claim.”
- “A final judgment resolves all issues in a case, leaving nothing for future determination.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.