Stow v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In addition, the trial court never entered a written finding of competency, further indicating that the trial court did not make an independent competency determination.”
• “To the extent that the trial court relied on defense counsel’s representation that Shakes was competent, such reliance is not permitted.”
• \[T]he trial court did not ... make an independent determination of competency ... [and] gave no indication that it had reviewed the report submitted by the psychologist.\
• \[T]he trial court did not ... make an independent determination of competency ... [and] gave no indication that it had reviewed the report submitted by the psychologist.\
• “[T]he trial court did not . . . make an independent determination of competency . . . [and] gave no indication that it had reviewed the report submitted by the psychologist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).