Stow v. Betts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the public interest may 6 extend to statements about conduct between private individuals”
• challenged statements “plainly [fell] within . . . the rubric of consumer information” about 26 the plaintiff’s business and “were intended to serve as a warning to consumers about his 27 trustworthiness”
• defendants’ statements published to other consumers implicated a public issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).