Stover v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where an appellate court does not know the reason for the jury’s verdict, it need not invalidate the conviction on a compound offense even if it is logically inconsistent with an acquittal on the underlying offense, but should uphold the conviction if the evidence supports it
• finding that where an appellate court does not know the reason for the jury’s verdict, it need not invalidate the conviction on a compound offense even if it is logically inconsistent with an acquittal on the underlying offense, but should uphold the conviction if the evidence supports it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fitzpatrick v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-27· cited 2×
• Brendon John Fitzpatrick v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-27

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Powell
  Supreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 2,102×
• Short v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-10-05· cited 469×
• Milam v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-03-12· cited 180×
• Kimble v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-06-03· cited 31×
• Bellamy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-11-29· cited 9×