Skip to main content
· 8/29/1996

Stovall v. State of Oregon

Citations

  • 922 P.2d 646
  • 324 Or. 92
  • 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2237
  • 1996 Ore. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[P]articipating PERS employers * * * promised plaintiffs that plaintiffs would receive, at a minimum, the retirement compensation provided in the PERS statutes.”
  • “[Participating PERS employers * * * promised plaintiffs that plaintiffs would receive, at a minimum, the retirement compensation provided in the PERS statutes.”
  • “[P]articipating PERS employers * * * promised plaintiffs that plaintiffs would receive, at a minimum, the retirement compensation provided in the PERS statutes.”
  • “[The] employers were the entities that agreed to the terms of [the employees’] com- pensation, including the terms relating to retirement ben- efits.”
  • “[The] employers were the entities that agreed to the terms of [the employees’] compensation, including the terms relating to retirement benefits.”
  • former ORS 237.051(1)(b) does not limit the terms to which the parties to an integration contract may agree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.