· 8/29/1996
Stovall v. State of Oregon
Citations
- 922 P.2d 646
- 324 Or. 92
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2237
- 1996 Ore. LEXIS 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[P]articipating PERS employers * * * promised plaintiffs that plaintiffs would receive, at a minimum, the retirement compensation provided in the PERS statutes.”
- “[Participating PERS employers * * * promised plaintiffs that plaintiffs would receive, at a minimum, the retirement compensation provided in the PERS statutes.”
- “[P]articipating PERS employers * * * promised plaintiffs that plaintiffs would receive, at a minimum, the retirement compensation provided in the PERS statutes.”
- “[The] employers were the entities that agreed to the terms of [the employees’] com- pensation, including the terms relating to retirement ben- efits.”
- “[The] employers were the entities that agreed to the terms of [the employees’] compensation, including the terms relating to retirement benefits.”
- former ORS 237.051(1)(b) does not limit the terms to which the parties to an integration contract may agree
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.