Skip to main content
· 11/18/1946

Stout v. Stinnett

Citations

  • 197 S.W.2d 564
  • 210 Ark. 684
  • 1946 Ark. LEXIS 417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where there is inconsistency between general and specific provisions, the specific provisions ordinarily qualify meaning of the general provisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.