· 6/11/1927
Stout v. Hosmer
Citations
- 123 Kan. 697
- 257 P. 223
- 1927 Kan. LEXIS 331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]lthough the transcript of the sentencing proceedings included the docket number for [a case that had been dropped]. This was a clerical error and the defendant suffered no prejudice from it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.