Skip to main content
· 6/11/1927

Stout v. Hosmer

Citations

  • 123 Kan. 697
  • 257 P. 223
  • 1927 Kan. LEXIS 331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]lthough the transcript of the sentencing proceedings included the docket number for [a case that had been dropped]. This was a clerical error and the defendant suffered no prejudice from it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.