Skip to main content
· 7/3/2000

Stoulil v. EDWIN A. EPSTEIN, JR., OPERATING

Citations

  • 3 P.3d 764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where a motion for a new trial raises disputed facts, a court errs by vacating the judgment without hearing testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.