Stotts v. Progressive Classic Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, by its terms, the trial court’s judgment was not final and appealable because “it only disposed of the liability issues concerning the respondents’ claims and left the entry of judgment as to the issue of damages for a later date if the respondents[] prevailed on appeal”
• setting forth the elements of a vexatious-refusal-to-pay claim, which includes a showing that the claimed loss was a covered loss under the policy
• setting forth the elements of a vexatious-refusal-to-pay claim, which includes a showing that the claimed loss was a covered loss under the policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).