Stottler Stagg & Associates, Inc. v. Argo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The Securities Act is not intended as protection for those shown able to fend for themselves; rather, the purpose is to protect the public from fraudulent and deceptive practices in the sale and marketing of securities.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Palmer v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-04· cited 19×
• Arthur Young & Co. v. Mariner Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-19· cited 12×
• Moecker v. Antoine
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-13· cited 9×
• Oil Resources, Inc. v. Florida, Department of Banking & Finance
  S.D. Florida· 1984-04-06· cited 5×
• Mortellite v. American Tower, LP
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-21· cited 4×
• Butterworth v. Quick & Reilly, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 1998-04-02· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.
  Supreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 1,616×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,366 Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc., James F. Pritchard, Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1978-03-28· cited 253×
• George Garfield v. T. C. Strain and R. E. Maresh
  Tenth Circuit· 1963-08-07· cited 28×
• Leithauser v. Harrison
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-10-09· cited 19×
• Rudd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-02· cited 15×
• Edwards v. Trulis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-02-22· cited 13×