Skip to main content
· 4/19/1993

Stotter Division of Graduate Plastics Company, Inc. v. District 65, United Auto Workers, Afl-Cio

Citations

  • 991 F.2d 997
  • 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2094
  • 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2065
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8626
  • 1993 WL 118482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a successor corporation had a duty to arbitrate the extent of its obligations under its predecessor's CBA because there was substantial continuity in the business enterprise
  • holding respondent in arbitration proceeding waived objection to selection of arbitrator by failing to ʺspecificallyʺ object, even though respondent objected to jurisdiction on different grounds
  • holding parties bound by incorporated AAA waiver rule as it related to failure to timely object to arbitrator
  • finding successor liability for ERISA contributions where successor had notice of arbitration and where businesses had “substantial continuity of identity in the business enterprise before and after the change”
  • examining the successor’s use of the same employees, equipment, products, and customers as factors in determining whether there was a “substantial continuity of identity in the business enterprise before and after [the] change” (internal quotation omitted)
  • discussing the importance of notice in finding substantial continuity between corporations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Cardamone, Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.