District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/3/1997
Stott v. State
Citations
- 701 So. 2d 917
- 1997 WL 741034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that nothing in plea colloquy conclusively rebuts appellant's allegation that his attorney incorrectly told him that if he went to trial he would face a minimum sentence of at least fifteen years, when the maximum possible sentence was 107.5 months
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Snodgrass v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-22· cited 30×
- Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-12· cited 9×
- Kemner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-01· cited 4×
- Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-20· cited 3×
- Debonis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-15· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LerouxSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-19· cited 196×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-11· cited 12×
- Bond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-02· cited 11×
- Choi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-25· cited 7×
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.