Stotler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defense witness's in-court recitation of defendant's out of court statements, which where inaudible on surveillance videotape, were not hearsay because they were \statements describing ambiguous acts\ or \verbal parts of acts.\
• finding the trial court erred in precluding appellant from cross-examining co-defendant as to conversations that occurred during a transaction shown on a videotape entered into evidence by the State
• finding the trial court erred in precluding appellant from cross-examining co-defendant as to conversations that occurred during a transaction shown on a videotape entered into evidence by the State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).