Skip to main content
· 2/23/1989

Stotler and Company, Cross-Appellee v. William J. Able, Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 870 F.2d 1158
  • 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 363
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3768
  • 1989 WL 25496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing a district court’s decision on a contempt petition under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 70 and 71 as discretionary in character and reviewing for abuse of discretion
  • describing a district court’s decision on a contempt petition under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 70 and 71 as discretionary in character and reviewing for abuse of discretion
  • “[O]rdinarily a court may find a nonparty in contempt [for violating an injunction] if that person has ‘actual knowledge’ of the court order [among other requirements].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Flaum, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.