Skip to main content
· 1/10/1989

Stotler and Co. v. Khabushani

Citations

  • 703 F. Supp. 738
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222
  • 1989 WL 3356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “in light of the court’s ruling on Count I of the complaint, [the plaintiff’s] alternative theory of recovery on Count II is moot”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holderman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.