· 1/10/1989
Stotler and Co. v. Khabushani
Citations
- 703 F. Supp. 738
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222
- 1989 WL 3356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “in light of the court’s ruling on Count I of the complaint, [the plaintiff’s] alternative theory of recovery on Count II is moot”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holderman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.