Skip to main content
· 3/18/2005

Story v. RAJ Properties, Inc.

Citations

  • 909 So. 2d 797
  • 2005 WL 647912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In a case of classic spoliation, the offending party purposefully and wrongfully destroyed evidence he knew was supportive of the interest of his opponent.” (cleaned up)
  • custodial party ignored discovery requests and neglected to inform noncustodial party of impending destruction
  • articulating a five-factor test that substantively evaluates the same considerations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: See

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.