Skip to main content
· 11/17/2004

Story v. Lanier

Citations

  • 166 S.W.3d 167
  • 2004 Tenn. App. LEXIS 761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a trial court “is vested with considerable discretion when determining whether prejudgment interest is warranted”
  • indicating that more than the testimony of a single interested witness is sufficient to establish a resulting trust
  • allowing prejudgment interest when it was first raised in a motion for new trial
  • ―‗[I]t is a general principle that the trust must arise at the time of the purchase, attach to the title at that time and not arise out of any subsequent contract or transaction.‘‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alan E. Highers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.