Skip to main content
· 2/7/1997

Story v. Kindt

Citations

  • 970 F. Supp. 435
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7531
  • 1997 WL 377654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the party invoking work product protection bears the burden of establishing both that the document was made in anticipation of and in preparation for litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bloch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.