Story v. JM Fields, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that at least 100 calls over five months could give rise to liability under the FCCPA
• holding that while defendant’s conduct in making frequent and harassing phone calls could support a claim for actual damages under the FCCPA, punitive damages were not warranted absent evidence of malice
• holding 100 calls over five months, where calls came almost daily and sometimes two or three times per day, continuing after defendant was told to quit calling, presented a jury question
• one hundred calls over a five-month period, including calls after a request to stop and an instruction to initiate legal action, were harassment
• one hundred calls over a five-month period, including calls after a request to stop and an instruction to initiate legal action, were harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).