Storms v. Tuck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that vendor/vendee relationship is not necessarily required to create easement by estoppel
• indicating that vendor/vendee relationship is not necessarily required to create easement by estoppel
• indicating that vendor/vendee relationship is not necessarily required to create easement by estoppel
• discussing the doctrine of easement by estoppel in the context of estoppel by silence
• “Essential to the creation of estoppel is that the misrepresentation be communicated to, believed, and relied upon by the innocent party.”
• “[T]he owner of land may be estopped to deny the existence of an easement by making representations that have been acted upon by a purchaser to his detriment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).