Storey v. Storey
Citations
- 125 Ill. 608
- 1 L.R.A. 320
Syllabus
<p>1. Divorce and alimony—by consent of parties. While a husband and wife may not enter into an agreement for divorce, yet the amount of alimony the husband is to pay to the wife, the terms of the payment, and the length of time payment is to be made, may be arranged between them by consent. When husband and wife agree upon alimony, the court will embody their agreement upon that subject in its decree, and it will thereafter conclude the parties.</p> <p>2. Same—decree for alimony—as a charge upon the husband's estate after his death. A decree for alimony to a wife in a suit for divorce brought by her, was entered, by consent of the parties, that the husband should thereafter pay the wife, so long as she should remain sole, the sum of $2000 per annum. On the same day the decree was entered, the husband executed to his wife a bond, in the sum of $50,000, conditioned for his performance of the decree, which was secured by a deed of trust upon real estate, which bond and trust deed were made binding upon the obligor, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, as also was his agreement to keep the property insured for her benefit: Held, that the agreement to pay the wife $2000 so long as she should remain unmarried, did not terminate with the life of the husband, but was binding upon his estate after his death.</p> <p>3. Contract—construction put upon it by the parties may be adopted. It is always allowable to look to the interpretation the contracting parties put upon their agreement, either contemporaneously or in its performance, for assistance in ascertaining its true meaning. No extrinsic evidence can be more valuable.</p> <p>4. Same — construction—several writings, when construed together. Where a decree for alimony is entered by consent of the parties, and the payment of the alimony is also secured by the bond of the husband and a deed of trust upon his real estate, all bearing the same date, the decree, bond and deed of trust will be construed together in
Judges: Magruder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walters v. WaltersIllinois Supreme Court· 1951-05-24· cited 86×
- Herrick v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court· 1925-12-16· cited 77×
- Walters v. WaltersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1950-11-17· cited 59×
- Guyton v. GuytonIllinois Supreme Court· 1959-09-24· cited 51×
- Stone v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court· 1913-08-29· cited 46×
- Sinkler v. SinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1923-07-26· cited 39×
- Barish v. BarishSupreme Court of Iowa· 1920-12-31· cited 39×
- Cross v. CrossIllinois Supreme Court· 1955-03-24· cited 35×
- Olson v. RossetterIllinois Supreme Court· 1948-01-22· cited 34×
- Ramsay v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1952-06-09· cited 33×
- King v. MollohanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1900-04-07· cited 30×
- Bertlee Co. v. Illinois Publishing & Printing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1943-11-17· cited 27×
- Johnson v. EverySupreme Court of Florida· 1957-02-06· cited 25×
- Geithman v. EichlerIllinois Supreme Court· 1914-12-16· cited 25×
- Aldrich v. AldrichWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1962-07-06· cited 24×
- MacAndrews & Forbes Co. v. Mechanical Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1937-10-15· cited 22×
- Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Virginia· 1953-09-10· cited 21×
- Matter of Estate of GustafsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-01-10· cited 20×
- Garmisa v. GarmisaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1972-01-28· cited 20×
- Estate of Kuhns v. KuhnsAlaska Supreme Court· 1976-05-21· cited 18×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court· 1865-11-15· cited 118×
- Stillman v. StillmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-05-14· cited 56×
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1874-07-01· cited 37×
- Vermont Street M. E. Church v. BroseIllinois Supreme Court· 1882-09-28· cited 34×
- Lennahan v. O'KeefeIllinois Supreme Court· 1883-11-20· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.