Storer v. Florida Sportservice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining when a criterion “is nonobjective or too vague to afford the applicant knowledge of the means by which to comply, the requirement is either one that is not enforceable . . . or, if it relates to public detriment, the burden shifts to the objector”
• a conditional use criterion that does not contain appropriately quantifiable standards “is so vague as to render an applicant’s burden to comply impossible because of the ambiguities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).