Storer v. Blake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that although plaintiff “concedes he did not make the requisite showing to prove the amount of his damages for inverse condemnation, but because the City unreasonably violated his right to ingress and egress, we find he is entitled to nominal damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).