Stop-N-Go of Western Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Board’s order directing a second hearing for additional evidence “did not place limitations upon [the e]mployer’s right to subpoena witnesses, including [the c]laimant[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).