Stoot v. City of Everett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that child’s age, when combined with inconsistent statements and confused identifications, rendered allegations too unreliable to create probable cause
• holding that an in-school interview of a student suspecting of committing child abuse was a seizure under the Fourth Amendment
• holding that in-school interview of student suspected of committing abuse was a seizure
• concluding that a police officer, who allegedly coerced statements, may incur liability under § 1983 for violation of the Fifth Amendment when a prosecutor used those statements in a criminal case
• concluding that a police officer, who allegedly coerced statements, may incur liability under § 1983 for violation of the Fifth Amendment when a prosecutor used those statements in a criminal case
• holding that criminal defendant had Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination “in the arraignment hearing” where allegedly coerced statements were used against him in an affidavit filed by the prosecutor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).