District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/7/1986
Stooksbury v. State
Citations
- 495 So. 2d 845
- 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2127
- 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- conclusion that defendant is unsuitable candidate for probation is not clear and convincing reason to deviate from guidelines.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bart, Hub, Pearson, Schwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.